picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Ling-3.0-flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol Pro (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-18.

Ling-3.0-flash OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol Pro (batch)
Vendorinclusionaiopenai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score64.4-
Input Price$0.02/M$1.25/M
Output Price$0.06/M$7.50/M
Context Window262,1441,050,000
Max Output32,768128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision-✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index62.4-
ai_index_agentic48.4-
ai_index_coding83.6-

Who wins by task?

TaskLing-3.0-flashOpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol Pro (batch)
SQL Generation 159 133
Code Review 152 132
Code Completion 130 118
Code Refactoring 148 136
Bug Fixing 162 136
Unit Test Generation 144 124
Code Documentation 135 130
Regex Writing 132 118
CI/CD Pipelines 135 120
Frontend Component Design 110 122
Data Analysis 158 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 145 133
ETL Scripting 142 128
JSON Extraction 146 122
Bulk Data Labeling 134 119
OCR / Document Parsing 95 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 95 131
Long-Document Summarization 146 137
Short-Form Summarization 130 114
Blog Post Writing 133 121

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Ling-3.0-flash Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol Pro (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol Pro (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol Pro (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Ling-3.0-flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol Pro (batch)