picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-18.

Claude Opus 5 (batch) Ling-3.0-flash
Vendoranthropicinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score100.064.4
Input Price$2.50/M$0.02/M
Output Price$12.50/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,000,000262,144
Max Output128,00032,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index100.062.4
ai_index_agentic97.648.4
ai_index_coding100.083.6

Who wins by task?

TaskClaude Opus 5 (batch)Ling-3.0-flash
SQL Generation 175 159
Code Review 171 152
Code Completion 119 130
Code Refactoring 167 148
Bug Fixing 187 162
Unit Test Generation 157 144
Code Documentation 142 135
Regex Writing 136 132
CI/CD Pipelines 147 135
Frontend Component Design 149 110
Data Analysis 177 158
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 154 145
ETL Scripting 157 142
JSON Extraction 138 146
Bulk Data Labeling 123 134
OCR / Document Parsing 148 95
Table Extraction from PDFs 148 95
Long-Document Summarization 162 146
Short-Form Summarization 122 130
Blog Post Writing 142 133

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Claude Opus 5 (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Claude Opus 5 (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Claude Opus 5 (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Claude Opus 5 (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Ling-3.0-flash