head-to-head

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-06.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
Vendordeepseekinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score57.730.4
Input Price$0.22/M$0.02/M
Output Price$0.65/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output262,14432,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index57.533.2

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.38, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 10.3 times cheaper for the same work.

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Only DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp offers image input.

On our blended benchmark score DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp leads 57.7 to 30.4.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp scores higher on 18 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others), Ling 3.0 Flash on 2 (JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling).

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp was released in August 2026 and Ling 3.0 Flash in July 2026.

Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp if you need long documents, image input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
SQL Generation 140 135
Code Review 142 132
Code Completion 133 129
Code Refactoring 145 133
Bug Fixing 146 136
Unit Test Generation 130 125
Code Documentation 137 129
Regex Writing 125 123
CI/CD Pipelines 126 121
Frontend Component Design 128 96
Data Analysis 132 129
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 129
ETL Scripting 136 127
JSON Extraction 131 132
Bulk Data Labeling 129 130
OCR / Document Parsing 133 84
Table Extraction from PDFs 133 84
Long-Document Summarization 147 135
Short-Form Summarization 126 125
Blog Post Writing 128 123

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Cohere: Command A+ vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.