Agents · best for

Top picks for Agent Workflows (2026)

Multi-step tool-using agents with planning. Ranked from 333 live models on the OpenRouter catalog, weighted for tool calling, reasoning quality, context window.

What this is Ranked by capability match + real benchmark scores (Aider Polyglot, Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index) + live pricing. Models need the right specs for Agent Workflows, then benchmark performance refines the order. Full methodology →
#ModelScoreIn / 1MOut / 1MContext
1 Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7anthropic/claude-opus-4.7 210 $5.00 $25.00 1,000,000 Details →
2 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 209 $3.00 $15.00 1,000,000 Details →
3 OpenAI: GPT-5.4openai/gpt-5.4 199 $2.50 $15.00 1,050,000 Details →
4 Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8anthropic/claude-opus-4.8 198 $5.00 $25.00 1,000,000 Details →
5 Z.ai: GLM 5.2z-ai/glm-5.2 197 $0.97 $3.04 1,048,576 Details →
6 OpenAI: GPT-5.5openai/gpt-5.5 194 $5.00 $30.00 1,050,000 Details →
7 DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Prodeepseek/deepseek-v4-pro 193 $0.43 $0.87 1,048,576 Details →
8 OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terraopenai/gpt-5.6-terra 193 $2.50 $15.00 1,050,000 Details →
9 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 192 $2.00 $10.00 1,000,000 Details →
10 xAI: Grok 4.5x-ai/grok-4.5 192 $2.00 $6.00 500,000 Details →
11 Anthropic: Claude Fable 5anthropic/claude-fable-5 192 $10.00 $50.00 1,000,000 Details →
12 OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Lunaopenai/gpt-5.6-luna 191 $1.00 $6.00 1,050,000 Details →
13 OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Solopenai/gpt-5.6-sol 190 $5.00 $30.00 1,050,000 Details →
14 OpenAI: GPT-5openai/gpt-5 189 $1.25 $10.00 400,000 Details →
15 DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash 189 $0.09 $0.19 1,048,576 Details →
AI Apps OnSpace AI Build and deploy AI-powered apps without code.
Try free →

Affiliate link. PicksByModel may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

How we ranked these

For Agent Workflows, we weight models on tool calling, reasoning quality, context window. Scores combine each model's public specs with independent benchmark results (Aider Polyglot coding scores, Artificial Analysis intelligence/coding/agentic indices) and live pricing. See full methodology →

About Agent Workflows

Agent workflows are multi-step processes where an AI model reasons about a problem, selects and uses appropriate tools sequentially, and adjusts based on results to reach a goal. You need this when a single API call won't solve your problem: database lookups followed by calculations, web searches feeding into document generation, or customer service routing across multiple systems. Good models maintain context across tool calls, handle failures gracefully, and don't hallucinate tool outputs. Poor performers lose track of previous steps, call tools incorrectly, or loop infinitely. The main trade-off is latency: each tool call adds round-trip time, so agents solving 5-step problems take longer than single-step completions, though function calling via OpenAI or Claude reduces overhead versus retrieval loops.

When to use: Use this when you need an AI to break down a complex task into smaller steps, look up real information, and make decisions based on what it finds. Examples: automated customer support that searches your knowledge base then creates tickets, financial analysis that fetches data then generates reports, or code debugging that runs tests and reads logs.

Common questions

What is the difference between agent workflows and simple function calling?

Function calling lets a model invoke one tool per response. Agent workflows add planning and loops: the model decides which tool to call, sees the result, and decides what to do next (call another tool, synthesize an answer, or ask for clarification). Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o excel at this iterative reasoning.

How much does it cost to run an agent that takes 10 steps versus one that takes 1 step?

Roughly 10 times more in token spend, since each step generates new reasoning tokens and parses tool outputs. Batching tools, caching prompts between calls, and pruning unnecessary steps can reduce this significantly. For cost-sensitive use cases, smaller models like Claude 3.5 Haiku may be preferable if accuracy permits.

Related tasks