picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Ling-3.0-flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-18.

ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo Ling-3.0-flash
Vendorbytedance-seedinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-64.4
Input Price$0.50/M$0.02/M
Output Price$2.50/M$0.06/M
Context Window262,144262,144
Max Output262,14432,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-62.4
ai_index_agentic-48.4
ai_index_coding-83.6

Who wins by task?

TaskByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 TurboLing-3.0-flash
SQL Generation 130 159
Code Review 126 152
Code Completion 128 130
Code Refactoring 127 148
Bug Fixing 130 162
Unit Test Generation 121 144
Code Documentation 125 135
Regex Writing 119 132
CI/CD Pipelines 117 135
Frontend Component Design 122 110
Data Analysis 124 158
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 128 145
ETL Scripting 122 142
JSON Extraction 131 146
Bulk Data Labeling 129 134
OCR / Document Parsing 128 95
Table Extraction from PDFs 128 95
Long-Document Summarization 129 146
Short-Form Summarization 123 130
Blog Post Writing 118 133

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6