head-to-head

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash vs xAI: Grok Latest

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-02.

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash xAI: Grok Latest
Vendorinclusionai~x-ai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score30.45.8
Input Price$0.02/M$2.00/M
Output Price$0.06/M$6.00/M
Context Window262,144500,000
Max Output32,768450,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision-✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index33.211.4

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and Grok Latest costs $3.50, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 95.2 times cheaper for the same work.

Grok Latest reads up to 500,000 tokens at once, roughly 750 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Only Grok Latest offers image input.

On our blended benchmark score Ling 3.0 Flash leads 30.4 to 5.8.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Ling 3.0 Flash scores higher on 8 (SQL Generation, Code Completion, Regex Writing and others), Grok Latest on 12 (Code Review, Code Refactoring, Bug Fixing and others).

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost or benchmark performance; pick Grok Latest if you need long documents or image input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 FlashxAI: Grok Latest
SQL Generation 135 134
Code Review 132 134
Code Completion 129 118
Code Refactoring 133 137
Bug Fixing 136 138
Unit Test Generation 125 125
Code Documentation 129 131
Regex Writing 123 119
CI/CD Pipelines 121 121
Frontend Component Design 96 123
Data Analysis 129 125
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 129 133
ETL Scripting 127 129
JSON Extraction 132 122
Bulk Data Labeling 130 119
OCR / Document Parsing 84 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 84 131
Long-Document Summarization 135 139
Short-Form Summarization 125 115
Blog Post Writing 123 122

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs xAI: Grok Latest ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs xAI: Grok Latest ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs xAI: Grok Latest DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.