head-to-head

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-02.

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5
Vendorinclusionaix-ai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score30.465.0
Input Price$0.02/M$2.00/M
Output Price$0.06/M$6.00/M
Context Window262,144500,000
Max Output32,768450,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision-✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index33.264.0

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and Grok 4.5 costs $3.50, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 95.2 times cheaper for the same work.

Grok 4.5 reads up to 500,000 tokens at once, roughly 750 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Only Grok 4.5 offers image input.

On our blended benchmark score Grok 4.5 leads 65.0 to 30.4.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Ling 3.0 Flash scores higher on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others), Grok 4.5 on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost; pick Grok 4.5 if you need long documents, image input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 FlashSpaceXAI: Grok 4.5
SQL Generation 135 140
Code Review 132 144
Code Completion 129 119
Code Refactoring 133 146
Bug Fixing 136 148
Unit Test Generation 125 131
Code Documentation 129 136
Regex Writing 123 124
CI/CD Pipelines 121 127
Frontend Component Design 96 129
Data Analysis 129 133
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 129 135
ETL Scripting 127 137
JSON Extraction 132 122
Bulk Data Labeling 130 119
OCR / Document Parsing 84 134
Table Extraction from PDFs 84 134
Long-Document Summarization 135 147
Short-Form Summarization 125 117
Blog Post Writing 123 128

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5 ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5 ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5 DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.