picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Ling-3.0-flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-18.

Ling-3.0-flash OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch)
Vendorinclusionaiopenai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score64.492.7
Input Price$0.02/M$1.00/M
Output Price$0.06/M$6.00/M
Context Window262,1441,050,000
Max Output32,768128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision-✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index62.493.3
ai_index_agentic48.482.8
ai_index_coding83.6100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskLing-3.0-flashOpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch)
SQL Generation 159 173
Code Review 152 169
Code Completion 130 120
Code Refactoring 148 165
Bug Fixing 162 183
Unit Test Generation 144 155
Code Documentation 135 143
Regex Writing 132 136
CI/CD Pipelines 135 146
Frontend Component Design 110 148
Data Analysis 158 173
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 145 154
ETL Scripting 142 155
JSON Extraction 146 140
Bulk Data Labeling 134 125
OCR / Document Parsing 95 147
Table Extraction from PDFs 95 147
Long-Document Summarization 146 161
Short-Form Summarization 130 123
Blog Post Writing 133 141

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Ling-3.0-flash Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Ling-3.0-flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra (batch)