head-to-head

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-11.

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
Vendorz-aiinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score70.630.4
Input Price$0.15/M$0.02/M
Output Price$0.50/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output943,71732,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index69.033.2

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.28, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 7.5 times cheaper for the same work.

GLM 5.3 Flash reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Only GLM 5.3 Flash offers image input and video input.

On our blended benchmark score GLM 5.3 Flash leads 70.6 to 30.4.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on 18 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others), Ling 3.0 Flash on 2 (JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling).

GLM 5.3 Flash was released in August 2026 and Ling 3.0 Flash in July 2026.

Pick GLM 5.3 Flash if you need long documents, image input, video input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskZ.ai: GLM 5.3 FlashinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
SQL Generation 142 135
Code Review 145 132
Code Completion 133 129
Code Refactoring 147 133
Bug Fixing 149 136
Unit Test Generation 132 125
Code Documentation 138 129
Regex Writing 126 123
CI/CD Pipelines 128 121
Frontend Component Design 130 96
Data Analysis 134 129
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 129
ETL Scripting 137 127
JSON Extraction 131 132
Bulk Data Labeling 129 130
OCR / Document Parsing 134 84
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 84
Long-Document Summarization 149 135
Short-Form Summarization 127 125
Blog Post Writing 130 123

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Cohere: Command A+ vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.