head-to-head

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-29.

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash
Vendoranthropicz-ai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score97.070.6
Input Price$1.00/M$0.15/M
Output Price$5.00/M$0.50/M
Context Window1,000,0001,310,720
Max Output128,000943,717
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index92.469.0

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.28 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) costs $2.25, so GLM 5.3 Flash is about 8.2 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,000,000 and 1,310,720 tokens, about 1,500 and 1,966 pages.

Only GLM 5.3 Flash offers video input.

On our blended benchmark score Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) leads 97.0 to 70.6.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) scores higher on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), GLM 5.3 Flash on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others).

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) was released in September 2026 and GLM 5.3 Flash in August 2026.

Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) if you need benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick GLM 5.3 Flash if you need lower cost or video input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch)Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash
SQL Generation 144 142
Code Review 149 145
Code Completion 120 133
Code Refactoring 150 147
Bug Fixing 153 149
Unit Test Generation 135 132
Code Documentation 139 138
Regex Writing 128 126
CI/CD Pipelines 131 128
Frontend Component Design 133 130
Data Analysis 137 134
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 137 136
ETL Scripting 140 137
JSON Extraction 122 131
Bulk Data Labeling 120 129
OCR / Document Parsing 135 134
Table Extraction from PDFs 135 134
Long-Document Summarization 152 149
Short-Form Summarization 119 127
Blog Post Writing 132 130

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Space Bunny Alpha Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Cohere: Command A+ Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.