head-to-head

SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-02.

SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
Vendorx-aiinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score75.330.4
Input Price$2.00/M$0.02/M
Output Price$6.00/M$0.06/M
Context Window500,000262,144
Max Output450,00032,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index73.133.2

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and Grok 4.6 costs $3.50, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 95.2 times cheaper for the same work.

Grok 4.6 reads up to 500,000 tokens at once, roughly 750 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Only Grok 4.6 offers image input.

On our blended benchmark score Grok 4.6 leads 75.3 to 30.4.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Grok 4.6 scores higher on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Ling 3.0 Flash on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others).

Grok 4.6 was released in August 2026 and Ling 3.0 Flash in July 2026.

Pick Grok 4.6 if you need long documents, image input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskSpaceXAI: Grok 4.6inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
SQL Generation 142 135
Code Review 145 132
Code Completion 119 129
Code Refactoring 147 133
Bug Fixing 149 136
Unit Test Generation 132 125
Code Documentation 137 129
Regex Writing 125 123
CI/CD Pipelines 128 121
Frontend Component Design 130 96
Data Analysis 135 129
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 129
ETL Scripting 138 127
JSON Extraction 122 132
Bulk Data Labeling 119 130
OCR / Document Parsing 134 84
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 84
Long-Document Summarization 148 135
Short-Form Summarization 118 125
Blog Post Writing 130 123

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.