head-to-head

Thinking Machines: Inkling Small vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-02.

Thinking Machines: Inkling Small inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
Vendorthinkingmachinesinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score40.630.4
Input Price$0.45/M$0.02/M
Output Price$1.20/M$0.06/M
Context Window524,288262,144
Max Output262,14432,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output-✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index42.333.2

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and Inkling Small costs $0.75, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 20.4 times cheaper for the same work.

Inkling Small reads up to 524,288 tokens at once, roughly 786 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Only Inkling Small offers image input and audio input; only Ling 3.0 Flash offers structured output.

On our blended benchmark score Inkling Small leads 40.6 to 30.4.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Inkling Small scores higher on 13 (Code Review, Code Completion, Code Refactoring and others), Ling 3.0 Flash on 7 (SQL Generation, Unit Test Generation, CI/CD Pipelines and others).

Pick Inkling Small if you need long documents, image input, audio input or benchmark performance; pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost or structured output.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskThinking Machines: Inkling SmallinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
SQL Generation 130 135
Code Review 136 132
Code Completion 132 129
Code Refactoring 138 133
Bug Fixing 144 136
Unit Test Generation 121 125
Code Documentation 135 129
Regex Writing 123 123
CI/CD Pipelines 121 121
Frontend Component Design 123 96
Data Analysis 126 129
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 123 129
ETL Scripting 129 127
JSON Extraction 119 132
Bulk Data Labeling 125 130
OCR / Document Parsing 125 84
Table Extraction from PDFs 125 84
Long-Document Summarization 144 135
Short-Form Summarization 125 125
Blog Post Writing 126 123

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Small DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.