picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-18.

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Ling-3.0-flash
Vendorqweninclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-64.4
Input Price$0.03/M$0.02/M
Output Price$0.13/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,000,000262,144
Max Output65,53632,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-62.4
ai_index_agentic-48.4
ai_index_coding-83.6

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.7 FlashLing-3.0-flash
SQL Generation 134 159
Code Review 132 152
Code Completion 132 130
Code Refactoring 136 148
Bug Fixing 136 162
Unit Test Generation 124 144
Code Documentation 132 135
Regex Writing 120 132
CI/CD Pipelines 120 135
Frontend Component Design 122 110
Data Analysis 124 158
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 134 145
ETL Scripting 128 142
JSON Extraction 132 146
Bulk Data Labeling 130 134
OCR / Document Parsing 131 95
Table Extraction from PDFs 131 95
Long-Document Summarization 138 146
Short-Form Summarization 124 130
Blog Post Writing 122 133

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Ling-3.0-flash