head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-02.

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
Vendorqweninclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-30.4
Input Price$0.03/M$0.02/M
Output Price$0.13/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,000,000262,144
Max Output65,53632,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-33.2

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and Qwen3.7 Flash costs $0.062, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 1.7 times cheaper for the same work.

Qwen3.7 Flash reads up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Only Qwen3.7 Flash offers image input and video input.

Across the 18 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.7 Flash scores higher on 9 (Code Completion, Code Refactoring, Code Documentation and others), Ling 3.0 Flash on 9 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Bug Fixing and others).

Pick Qwen3.7 Flash if you need long documents, image input or video input; pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.7 FlashinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
SQL Generation 134 135
Code Review 132 132
Code Completion 132 129
Code Refactoring 136 133
Bug Fixing 136 136
Unit Test Generation 124 125
Code Documentation 132 129
Regex Writing 120 123
CI/CD Pipelines 120 121
Frontend Component Design 122 96
Data Analysis 124 129
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 134 129
ETL Scripting 128 127
OCR / Document Parsing 131 84
Table Extraction from PDFs 131 84
Long-Document Summarization 138 135
Short-Form Summarization 124 125
Blog Post Writing 122 123

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.