head-to-head

Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-02.

Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
Vendormetainclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score66.530.4
Input Price$1.25/M$0.02/M
Output Price$4.25/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output943,71832,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index65.333.2

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and Muse Spark 1.2 costs $2.31, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 62.9 times cheaper for the same work.

Muse Spark 1.2 reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Only Muse Spark 1.2 offers image input and video input.

On our blended benchmark score Muse Spark 1.2 leads 66.5 to 30.4.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Ling 3.0 Flash on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others).

Muse Spark 1.2 was released in August 2026 and Ling 3.0 Flash in July 2026.

Pick Muse Spark 1.2 if you need long documents, image input, video input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskMeta: Muse Spark 1.2inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
SQL Generation 141 135
Code Review 144 132
Code Completion 120 129
Code Refactoring 146 133
Bug Fixing 148 136
Unit Test Generation 131 125
Code Documentation 136 129
Regex Writing 125 123
CI/CD Pipelines 127 121
Frontend Component Design 129 96
Data Analysis 133 129
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 129
ETL Scripting 137 127
JSON Extraction 122 132
Bulk Data Labeling 120 130
OCR / Document Parsing 134 84
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 84
Long-Document Summarization 147 135
Short-Form Summarization 118 125
Blog Post Writing 129 123

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.