head-to-head

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-02.

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro
Vendorinclusionaiopenai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score30.4-
Input Price$0.02/M$2.00/M
Output Price$0.06/M$12.00/M
Context Window262,1441,050,000
Max Output32,768128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision-✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index33.2-

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and GPT-5.6 Terra Pro costs $5.00, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 136.1 times cheaper for the same work.

GPT-5.6 Terra Pro reads up to 1,050,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,575 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Only GPT-5.6 Terra Pro offers image input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Ling 3.0 Flash scores higher on 13 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others), GPT-5.6 Terra Pro on 7 (Code Refactoring, Frontend Component Design, CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup and others).

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost; pick GPT-5.6 Terra Pro if you need long documents or image input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 FlashOpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro
SQL Generation 135 132
Code Review 132 132
Code Completion 129 117
Code Refactoring 133 136
Bug Fixing 136 136
Unit Test Generation 125 124
Code Documentation 129 129
Regex Writing 123 117
CI/CD Pipelines 121 120
Frontend Component Design 96 122
Data Analysis 129 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 129 132
ETL Scripting 127 128
JSON Extraction 132 121
Bulk Data Labeling 130 117
OCR / Document Parsing 84 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 84 131
Long-Document Summarization 135 136
Short-Form Summarization 125 113
Blog Post Writing 123 120

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.