picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Ling-3.0-flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-18.

Ling-3.0-flash OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro
Vendorinclusionaiopenai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score64.4-
Input Price$0.02/M$2.00/M
Output Price$0.06/M$12.00/M
Context Window262,1441,050,000
Max Output32,768128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision-✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index62.4-
ai_index_agentic48.4-
ai_index_coding83.6-

Who wins by task?

TaskLing-3.0-flashOpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro
SQL Generation 159 132
Code Review 152 132
Code Completion 130 117
Code Refactoring 148 136
Bug Fixing 162 136
Unit Test Generation 144 124
Code Documentation 135 129
Regex Writing 132 117
CI/CD Pipelines 135 120
Frontend Component Design 110 122
Data Analysis 158 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 145 132
ETL Scripting 142 128
JSON Extraction 146 121
Bulk Data Labeling 134 117
OCR / Document Parsing 95 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 95 131
Long-Document Summarization 146 136
Short-Form Summarization 130 113
Blog Post Writing 133 120

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Ling-3.0-flash Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Ling-3.0-flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro