picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Ling-3.0-flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-18.

Ling-3.0-flash OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)
Vendorinclusionaiopenai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score64.488.2
Input Price$0.02/M$0.10/M
Output Price$0.06/M$0.60/M
Context Window262,1441,050,000
Max Output32,768128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision-✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index62.486.3
ai_index_agentic48.477.4
ai_index_coding83.6100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskLing-3.0-flashOpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)
SQL Generation 159 172
Code Review 152 167
Code Completion 130 133
Code Refactoring 148 164
Bug Fixing 162 180
Unit Test Generation 144 154
Code Documentation 135 143
Regex Writing 132 137
CI/CD Pipelines 135 144
Frontend Component Design 110 146
Data Analysis 158 171
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 145 154
ETL Scripting 142 154
JSON Extraction 146 149
Bulk Data Labeling 134 135
OCR / Document Parsing 95 146
Table Extraction from PDFs 95 146
Long-Document Summarization 146 160
Short-Form Summarization 130 132
Blog Post Writing 133 140

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Ling-3.0-flash Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Ling-3.0-flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)