head-to-head

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
Vendorinclusionaiinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Input Price$0.06/M$0.02/M
Output Price$0.18/M$0.06/M
Context Window131,072262,144
Max Output32,76832,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio--

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.10, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 2.9 times cheaper for the same work.

Ling 3.0 Flash reads up to 262,144 tokens at once, roughly 393 pages of text, against about 197 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.

Only Ling 3.0 Flash VL offers image input and video input.

Across the 16 tasks where they differ, Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on 3 (Frontend Component Design, OCR / Document Parsing, Table Extraction from PDFs), Ling 3.0 Flash on 13 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

Ling 3.0 Flash VL was released in September 2026 and Ling 3.0 Flash in July 2026.

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL if you need image input or video input; pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost, long documents or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
SQL Generation 128 131
Code Review 121 126
Code Completion 126 129
Code Refactoring 119 127
Bug Fixing 125 130
Unit Test Generation 118 121
Code Documentation 121 126
CI/CD Pipelines 114 117
Frontend Component Design 122 92
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 123 128
ETL Scripting 117 122
Bulk Data Labeling 129 130
OCR / Document Parsing 125 83
Table Extraction from PDFs 125 83
Long-Document Summarization 121 129
Blog Post Writing 116 119

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.