head-to-head

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-23.

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Vendoranthropicinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score100.038.6
Input Price$2.00/M$0.06/M
Output Price$10.00/M$0.18/M
Context Window1,000,000131,072
Max Output128,00032,768
Tool Calling
Structured Output
Reasoning Mode
Vision
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index95.140.5

Who wins by task?

TaskAnthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL
SQL Generation 144 133
Code Review 150 128
Code Completion 119 127
Code Refactoring 151 126
Bug Fixing 154 132
Unit Test Generation 135 123
Code Documentation 138 124
Regex Writing 127 124
CI/CD Pipelines 131 119
Frontend Component Design 133 126
Data Analysis 138 130
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 124
ETL Scripting 141 122
JSON Extraction 121 132
Bulk Data Labeling 118 129
OCR / Document Parsing 135 127
Table Extraction from PDFs 135 127
Long-Document Summarization 152 128
Short-Form Summarization 118 126
Blog Post Writing 132 121

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Cohere: Command A+ vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) Cohere: Command A+ vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.