picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-04.

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Ling-3.0-flash
Vendorgoogleinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score93.464.0
Input Price$0.38/M$0.02/M
Output Price$1.88/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output65,53632,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index96.862.4
ai_index_agentic82.548.4
ai_index_coding100.083.6

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)Ling-3.0-flash
SQL Generation 173 159
Code Review 169 152
Code Completion 133 130
Code Refactoring 166 148
Bug Fixing 183 162
Unit Test Generation 156 144
Code Documentation 144 135
Regex Writing 138 132
CI/CD Pipelines 146 135
Frontend Component Design 148 110
Data Analysis 173 158
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 155 145
ETL Scripting 156 142
JSON Extraction 149 146
Bulk Data Labeling 135 134
OCR / Document Parsing 147 95
Table Extraction from PDFs 147 95
Long-Document Summarization 162 146
Short-Form Summarization 132 130
Blog Post Writing 142 133

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Ling-3.0-flash Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash