head-to-head

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-29.

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)
Vendoranthropicgoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score97.069.0
Input Price$1.00/M$0.38/M
Output Price$5.00/M$1.88/M
Context Window1,000,0001,048,576
Max Output128,00065,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index92.467.5

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) costs $0.84 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) costs $2.25, so Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) is about 2.7 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,000,000 and 1,048,576 tokens, about 1,500 and 1,573 pages.

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) offers audio input and video input.

On our blended benchmark score Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) leads 97.0 to 69.0.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) scores higher on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others).

Pick Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) if you need benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) if you need lower cost, audio input or video input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch)Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)
SQL Generation 144 141
Code Review 149 144
Code Completion 120 132
Code Refactoring 150 146
Bug Fixing 153 148
Unit Test Generation 135 132
Code Documentation 139 137
Regex Writing 128 126
CI/CD Pipelines 131 128
Frontend Component Design 133 130
Data Analysis 137 134
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 137 136
ETL Scripting 140 137
JSON Extraction 122 131
Bulk Data Labeling 120 129
OCR / Document Parsing 135 134
Table Extraction from PDFs 135 134
Long-Document Summarization 152 148
Short-Form Summarization 119 126
Blog Post Writing 132 129

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Space Bunny Alpha Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Cohere: Command A+ Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.