picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-18.

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) Ling-3.0-flash
Vendorgoogleinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score89.764.4
Input Price$0.19/M$0.02/M
Output Price$0.94/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output65,53632,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index92.462.4
ai_index_agentic74.448.4
ai_index_coding100.083.6

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)Ling-3.0-flash
SQL Generation 172 159
Code Review 168 152
Code Completion 133 130
Code Refactoring 165 148
Bug Fixing 181 162
Unit Test Generation 155 144
Code Documentation 144 135
Regex Writing 137 132
CI/CD Pipelines 145 135
Frontend Component Design 147 110
Data Analysis 171 158
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 154 145
ETL Scripting 155 142
JSON Extraction 149 146
Bulk Data Labeling 135 134
OCR / Document Parsing 147 95
Table Extraction from PDFs 147 95
Long-Document Summarization 161 146
Short-Form Summarization 132 130
Blog Post Writing 141 133

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu