head-to-head
Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-23.
| Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | qwen | |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 53.5 | 32.8 |
| Input Price | $1.50/M | $0.32/M |
| Output Price | $9.00/M | $2.70/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 262,144 |
| Max Output | 65,536 | 262,140 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 53.8 | 35.4 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 139 | 135 |
| Code Review | 142 | 133 |
| Code Completion | 119 | 129 |
| Code Refactoring | 144 | 133 |
| Bug Fixing | 146 | 137 |
| Unit Test Generation | 130 | 125 |
| Code Documentation | 134 | 129 |
| Regex Writing | 123 | 122 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 126 | 121 |
| Frontend Component Design | 128 | 126 |
| Data Analysis | 132 | 129 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 135 | 129 |
| ETL Scripting | 135 | 127 |
| JSON Extraction | 121 | 131 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 118 | 129 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 133 | 130 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 133 | 130 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 145 | 135 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 116 | 125 |
| Blog Post Writing | 127 | 123 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B
Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B