head-to-head
Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-06-17.
| Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | qwen | |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 85.6 | 72.4 |
| Input Price | $1.50/M | $0.29/M |
| Output Price | $9.00/M | $3.17/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 262,144 |
| Max Output | 65,536 | 262,140 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 82.8 | 61.1 |
| ai_index_agentic | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| ai_index_coding | 74.2 | 60.2 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash | Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 169 | 162 |
| Code Review | 165 | 154 |
| Code Completion | 119 | 129 |
| Code Refactoring | 162 | 149 |
| Bug Fixing | 181 | 170 |
| Unit Test Generation | 152 | 145 |
| Code Documentation | 141 | 135 |
| Regex Writing | 135 | 133 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 143 | 137 |
| Frontend Component Design | 145 | 141 |
| Data Analysis | 171 | 165 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 150 | 142 |
| ETL Scripting | 153 | 143 |
| JSON Extraction | 136 | 143 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 123 | 133 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 144 | 139 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 144 | 139 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 159 | 147 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 122 | 130 |
| Blog Post Writing | 139 | 134 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B