head-to-head
Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-23.
| Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ||
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 34.2 | 53.5 |
| Input Price | $0.30/M | $1.50/M |
| Output Price | $2.50/M | $9.00/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 65,536 | 65,536 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 36.6 | 53.8 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 138 | 139 |
| Code Review | 139 | 142 |
| Code Completion | 132 | 119 |
| Code Refactoring | 141 | 144 |
| Bug Fixing | 143 | 146 |
| Unit Test Generation | 128 | 130 |
| Regex Writing | 123 | 123 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 124 | 126 |
| Frontend Component Design | 126 | 128 |
| Data Analysis | 129 | 132 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 135 | 135 |
| ETL Scripting | 133 | 135 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 121 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 118 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 132 | 133 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 132 | 133 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 143 | 145 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 125 | 116 |
| Blog Post Writing | 126 | 127 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite