head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B
Vendorgoogleqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-65.8
Input Price$0.25/M$0.32/M
Output Price$1.50/M$3.20/M
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output65,53681,920
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-61.1
ai_index_agentic-44.6
ai_index_coding-88.6

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.62 and Qwen3.6 27B costs $1.12, so Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is about 1.8 times cheaper for the same work.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Qwen3.6 27B.

Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite offers audio input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite scores higher on 1 (Code Completion), Qwen3.6 27B on 19 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite was released in May 2026 and Qwen3.6 27B in April 2026.

Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite if you need lower cost, long documents or audio input; pick Qwen3.6 27B if you need the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteQwen: Qwen3.6 27B
SQL Generation 133 159
Code Review 132 152
Code Completion 131 129
Code Refactoring 136 148
Bug Fixing 136 162
Unit Test Generation 124 144
Code Documentation 131 134
Regex Writing 119 131
CI/CD Pipelines 120 135
Frontend Component Design 122 140
Data Analysis 124 158
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 133 145
ETL Scripting 128 142
JSON Extraction 131 145
Bulk Data Labeling 129 133
OCR / Document Parsing 131 141
Table Extraction from PDFs 131 141
Long-Document Summarization 137 145
Short-Form Summarization 123 129
Blog Post Writing 121 132

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B Anthropic: Claude Sonnet Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet Latest

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.