head-to-head

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-19.

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
Vendorz-aiinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score69.6-
Input Price$0.05/M$0.02/M
Output Price$0.18/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output131,07232,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index69.0-

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) costs $0.095, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 2.6 times cheaper for the same work.

GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Only GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) offers image input and video input.

Across the 19 tasks where they differ, GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) scores higher on 18 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others), Ling 3.0 Flash on 1 (Bulk Data Labeling).

GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) was released in August 2026 and Ling 3.0 Flash in July 2026.

Pick GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) if you need long documents, image input, video input or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskZ.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch)inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
SQL Generation 142 131
Code Review 145 126
Code Completion 133 129
Code Refactoring 147 127
Bug Fixing 149 130
Unit Test Generation 132 121
Code Documentation 138 126
Regex Writing 126 120
CI/CD Pipelines 128 117
Frontend Component Design 130 92
Data Analysis 134 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 128
ETL Scripting 137 122
Bulk Data Labeling 129 130
OCR / Document Parsing 134 83
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 83
Long-Document Summarization 149 129
Short-Form Summarization 127 124
Blog Post Writing 130 119

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Cohere: Command A+ vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.