picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-04.

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) Ling-3.0-flash
Vendorz-aiinclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score96.764.0
Input Price$0.15/M$0.02/M
Output Price$0.50/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,048,575262,144
Max Output943,71732,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index94.862.4
ai_index_agentic96.048.4
ai_index_coding100.083.6

Who wins by task?

TaskZ.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch)Ling-3.0-flash
SQL Generation 175 159
Code Review 170 152
Code Completion 133 130
Code Refactoring 166 148
Bug Fixing 186 162
Unit Test Generation 157 144
Code Documentation 145 135
Regex Writing 139 132
CI/CD Pipelines 147 135
Frontend Component Design 149 110
Data Analysis 176 158
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 155 145
ETL Scripting 157 142
JSON Extraction 149 146
Bulk Data Labeling 135 134
OCR / Document Parsing 147 95
Table Extraction from PDFs 147 95
Long-Document Summarization 162 146
Short-Form Summarization 133 130
Blog Post Writing 143 133

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Ling-3.0-flash Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash