head-to-head
Thinking Machines: Inkling vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-23.
| Thinking Machines: Inkling | Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | thinkingmachines | |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 39.4 | 53.5 |
| Input Price | $1.00/M | $1.50/M |
| Output Price | $4.05/M | $9.00/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 471,859 | 65,536 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | - | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 41.2 | 53.8 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Thinking Machines: Inkling | Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 130 | 139 |
| Code Review | 135 | 142 |
| Code Completion | 119 | 119 |
| Code Refactoring | 138 | 144 |
| Bug Fixing | 143 | 146 |
| Unit Test Generation | 120 | 130 |
| Regex Writing | 123 | 123 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 120 | 126 |
| Frontend Component Design | 122 | 128 |
| Data Analysis | 126 | 132 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 123 | 135 |
| ETL Scripting | 129 | 135 |
| JSON Extraction | 111 | 121 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 116 | 118 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 125 | 133 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 125 | 133 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 144 | 145 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 117 | 116 |
| Blog Post Writing | 126 | 127 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Thinking Machines: Inkling
ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Thinking Machines: Inkling
DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Thinking Machines: Inkling
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest vs Thinking Machines: Inkling