head-to-head
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-07-15.
| StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash | Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | stepfun | qwen |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 50.8 | 52.9 |
| Input Price | $0.20/M | $0.14/M |
| Output Price | $1.15/M | $1.00/M |
| Context Window | 256,000 | 262,144 |
| Max Output | 256,000 | 262,144 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 49.9 | 52.2 |
| ai_index_agentic | 35.5 | 35.3 |
| ai_index_coding | 65.3 | 69.1 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash | Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 153 | 154 |
| Code Review | 146 | 147 |
| Code Completion | 129 | 130 |
| Code Refactoring | 143 | 144 |
| Bug Fixing | 155 | 156 |
| Unit Test Generation | 139 | 140 |
| Code Documentation | 132 | 133 |
| Regex Writing | 129 | 129 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 131 | 132 |
| Frontend Component Design | 136 | 137 |
| Data Analysis | 150 | 151 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 141 | 141 |
| ETL Scripting | 137 | 138 |
| JSON Extraction | 142 | 143 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 133 | 133 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 137 | 138 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 137 | 138 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 142 | 142 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 128 | 128 |
| Blog Post Writing | 129 | 130 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra Pro vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B