head-to-head
Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-23.
| Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | qwen | |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 34.2 | 26.9 |
| Input Price | $0.30/M | $0.15/M |
| Output Price | $2.50/M | $1.00/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 262,144 |
| Max Output | 65,536 | 235,929 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 36.6 | 30.1 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 138 | 134 |
| Code Review | 139 | 132 |
| Code Completion | 132 | 129 |
| Code Refactoring | 141 | 132 |
| Bug Fixing | 143 | 136 |
| Unit Test Generation | 128 | 124 |
| Code Documentation | 134 | 129 |
| Regex Writing | 123 | 122 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 124 | 120 |
| Frontend Component Design | 126 | 125 |
| Data Analysis | 129 | 128 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 135 | 129 |
| ETL Scripting | 133 | 126 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 131 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 129 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 132 | 129 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 132 | 129 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 143 | 134 |
| Blog Post Writing | 126 | 122 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite