head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-21.

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
Vendorqweninclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score76.5-
Input Price$2.00/M$0.02/M
Output Price$6.00/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,000,000262,144
Max Output131,07232,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index74.9-

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $3.50, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 95.2 times cheaper for the same work.

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) reads up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Only Qwen3.8 Max (0902) offers image input and video input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Ling 3.0 Flash on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others).

Qwen3.8 Max (0902) was released in September 2026 and Ling 3.0 Flash in July 2026.

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) if you need long documents, image input, video input or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902)inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
SQL Generation 142 131
Code Review 146 126
Code Completion 119 129
Code Refactoring 148 127
Bug Fixing 150 130
Unit Test Generation 133 121
Code Documentation 137 126
Regex Writing 125 120
CI/CD Pipelines 129 117
Frontend Component Design 131 92
Data Analysis 135 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 128
ETL Scripting 138 122
JSON Extraction 122 132
Bulk Data Labeling 119 130
OCR / Document Parsing 134 83
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 83
Long-Document Summarization 149 129
Short-Form Summarization 118 124
Blog Post Writing 130 119

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.