head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-02.

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
Vendorqweninclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score55.630.4
Input Price$0.42/M$0.02/M
Output Price$3.00/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,000,000262,144
Max Output131,07232,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index55.633.2

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and Qwen3.8 27B costs $1.17, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 31.8 times cheaper for the same work.

Qwen3.8 27B reads up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Only Qwen3.8 27B offers image input and video input.

On our blended benchmark score Qwen3.8 27B leads 55.6 to 30.4.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on 18 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others), Ling 3.0 Flash on 2 (JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling).

Qwen3.8 27B was released in August 2026 and Ling 3.0 Flash in July 2026.

Pick Qwen3.8 27B if you need long documents, image input, video input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.8 27BinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
SQL Generation 140 135
Code Review 142 132
Code Completion 132 129
Code Refactoring 144 133
Bug Fixing 146 136
Unit Test Generation 130 125
Code Documentation 136 129
Regex Writing 124 123
CI/CD Pipelines 126 121
Frontend Component Design 128 96
Data Analysis 132 129
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 135 129
ETL Scripting 135 127
JSON Extraction 131 132
Bulk Data Labeling 129 130
OCR / Document Parsing 133 84
Table Extraction from PDFs 133 84
Long-Document Summarization 146 135
Short-Form Summarization 126 125
Blog Post Writing 128 123

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Cohere: Command A+ vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.