head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash
Vendorqwengoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score64.884.2
Input Price$0.32/M$1.50/M
Output Price$1.28/M$9.00/M
Context Window1,000,0001,048,576
Max Output131,07265,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index64.382.8
ai_index_agentic34.361.8
ai_index_coding92.2100.0

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.64 and Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $3.75, so Qwen3.7 Plus is about 5.9 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,000,000 and 1,048,576 tokens, about 1,500 and 1,573 pages.

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash offers audio input and video input.

On our blended benchmark score Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 84.2 to 64.8.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others), Gemini 3.5 Flash on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

Qwen3.7 Plus was released in June 2026 and Gemini 3.5 Flash in May 2026.

Pick Qwen3.7 Plus if you need lower cost; pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you need audio input, video input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.7 PlusGoogle: Gemini 3.5 Flash
SQL Generation 162 168
Code Review 157 164
Code Completion 133 119
Code Refactoring 157 162
Bug Fixing 166 176
Unit Test Generation 147 152
Code Documentation 140 141
Regex Writing 131 133
CI/CD Pipelines 138 143
Frontend Component Design 140 145
Data Analysis 156 167
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 151 153
ETL Scripting 147 152
JSON Extraction 146 138
Bulk Data Labeling 134 124
OCR / Document Parsing 144 146
Table Extraction from PDFs 144 146
Long-Document Summarization 153 157
Short-Form Summarization 129 121
Blog Post Writing 135 138

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.