head-to-head

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-19.

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
Vendormetainclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score81.7-
Input Price$1.25/M$0.02/M
Output Price$4.25/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output943,71832,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓-
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index79.4-

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and Muse Spark 1.3 costs $2.31, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 62.9 times cheaper for the same work.

Muse Spark 1.3 reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Only Muse Spark 1.3 offers image input and video input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Ling 3.0 Flash on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others).

Muse Spark 1.3 was released in September 2026 and Ling 3.0 Flash in July 2026.

Pick Muse Spark 1.3 if you need long documents, image input, video input or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskMeta: Muse Spark 1.3inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
SQL Generation 143 131
Code Review 147 126
Code Completion 120 129
Code Refactoring 148 127
Bug Fixing 151 130
Unit Test Generation 133 121
Code Documentation 138 126
Regex Writing 126 120
CI/CD Pipelines 129 117
Frontend Component Design 131 92
Data Analysis 135 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 128
ETL Scripting 139 122
JSON Extraction 122 132
Bulk Data Labeling 120 130
OCR / Document Parsing 135 83
Table Extraction from PDFs 135 83
Long-Document Summarization 150 129
Short-Form Summarization 118 124
Blog Post Writing 131 119

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.