picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Ling-3.0-flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-18.

Ling-3.0-flash Thinking Machines: Inkling
Vendorinclusionaithinkingmachines
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score64.470.5
Input Price$0.02/M$0.95/M
Output Price$0.06/M$4.05/M
Context Window262,1441,048,576
Max Output32,768262,144
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision-✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index62.469.8
ai_index_agentic48.456.3
ai_index_coding83.685.9

Who wins by task?

TaskLing-3.0-flashThinking Machines: Inkling
SQL Generation 159 164
Code Review 152 160
Code Completion 130 132
Code Refactoring 148 158
Bug Fixing 162 171
Unit Test Generation 144 148
Code Documentation 135 140
Regex Writing 132 132
CI/CD Pipelines 135 140
Frontend Component Design 110 142
Data Analysis 158 161
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 145 150
ETL Scripting 142 149
JSON Extraction 146 145
Bulk Data Labeling 134 133
OCR / Document Parsing 95 144
Table Extraction from PDFs 95 144
Long-Document Summarization 146 155
Short-Form Summarization 130 129
Blog Post Writing 133 136

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Ling-3.0-flash Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Ling-3.0-flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Thinking Machines: Inkling