head-to-head

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash MiniMax: MiniMax M3
Vendorinclusionaiminimax
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-78.0
Input Price$0.02/M$0.30/M
Output Price$0.06/M$1.20/M
Context Window262,1441,048,576
Max Output32,768512,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision-✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-73.3
ai_index_agentic-58.3
ai_index_coding-96.6

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and MiniMax M3 costs $0.60, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 16.3 times cheaper for the same work.

MiniMax M3 reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Only MiniMax M3 offers image input and video input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, MiniMax M3 on 20 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

Ling 3.0 Flash was released in July 2026 and MiniMax M3 in May 2026.

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost; pick MiniMax M3 if you need long documents, image input, video input or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 FlashMiniMax: MiniMax M3
SQL Generation 131 167
Code Review 126 162
Code Completion 129 133
Code Refactoring 127 160
Bug Fixing 130 173
Unit Test Generation 121 151
Code Documentation 126 142
Regex Writing 120 134
CI/CD Pipelines 117 141
Frontend Component Design 92 143
Data Analysis 124 164
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 128 153
ETL Scripting 122 151
JSON Extraction 132 147
Bulk Data Labeling 130 135
OCR / Document Parsing 83 145
Table Extraction from PDFs 83 145
Long-Document Summarization 129 156
Short-Form Summarization 124 131
Blog Post Writing 119 138

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3 ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3 ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.