picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Ling-3.0-flash vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-18.

Ling-3.0-flash Meta: Muse Spark 1.1
Vendorinclusionaimeta
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score64.485.2
Input Price$0.02/M$1.25/M
Output Price$0.06/M$4.25/M
Context Window262,1441,048,576
Max Output32,768-
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision-✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index62.487.8
ai_index_agentic48.465.6
ai_index_coding83.6100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskLing-3.0-flashMeta: Muse Spark 1.1
SQL Generation 159 170
Code Review 152 166
Code Completion 130 120
Code Refactoring 148 163
Bug Fixing 162 178
Unit Test Generation 144 153
Code Documentation 135 142
Regex Writing 132 135
CI/CD Pipelines 135 144
Frontend Component Design 110 146
Data Analysis 158 168
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 145 153
ETL Scripting 142 153
JSON Extraction 146 139
Bulk Data Labeling 134 126
OCR / Document Parsing 95 146
Table Extraction from PDFs 95 146
Long-Document Summarization 146 159
Short-Form Summarization 130 123
Blog Post Writing 133 139

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Ling-3.0-flash Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1 ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Ling-3.0-flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1