picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Ling-3.0-flash vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-18.

Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)
Vendorinclusionaigoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score64.484.4
Input Price$0.02/M$0.38/M
Output Price$0.06/M$1.88/M
Context Window262,1441,048,576
Max Output32,76865,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision-✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index62.485.1
ai_index_agentic48.466.8
ai_index_coding83.6100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskLing-3.0-flashGoogle: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)
SQL Generation 159 170
Code Review 152 165
Code Completion 130 133
Code Refactoring 148 163
Bug Fixing 162 178
Unit Test Generation 144 153
Code Documentation 135 143
Regex Writing 132 136
CI/CD Pipelines 135 143
Frontend Component Design 110 145
Data Analysis 158 168
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 145 154
ETL Scripting 142 153
JSON Extraction 146 148
Bulk Data Labeling 134 135
OCR / Document Parsing 95 146
Table Extraction from PDFs 95 146
Long-Document Summarization 146 159
Short-Form Summarization 130 131
Blog Post Writing 133 140

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Ling-3.0-flash Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Ling-3.0-flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch)