picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Ling-3.0-flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-18.

Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
Vendorinclusionaigoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score64.462.3
Input Price$0.02/M$0.30/M
Output Price$0.06/M$2.50/M
Context Window262,1441,048,576
Max Output32,76865,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision-✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index62.461.8
ai_index_agentic48.444.8
ai_index_coding83.681.4

Who wins by task?

TaskLing-3.0-flashGoogle: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
SQL Generation 159 161
Code Review 152 157
Code Completion 130 132
Code Refactoring 148 156
Bug Fixing 162 166
Unit Test Generation 144 146
Code Documentation 135 140
Regex Writing 132 131
CI/CD Pipelines 135 137
Frontend Component Design 110 139
Data Analysis 158 157
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 145 149
ETL Scripting 142 147
JSON Extraction 146 145
Bulk Data Labeling 134 133
OCR / Document Parsing 95 143
Table Extraction from PDFs 95 143
Long-Document Summarization 146 153
Short-Form Summarization 130 129
Blog Post Writing 133 135

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Ling-3.0-flash Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Ling-3.0-flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Ling-3.0-flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite