head-to-head

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-02.

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)
Vendorinclusionaianthropic
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score30.463.9
Input Price$0.02/M$1.00/M
Output Price$0.06/M$5.00/M
Context Window262,1441,000,000
Max Output32,768128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision-✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index33.263.0

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.037 and Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) costs $2.25, so Ling 3.0 Flash is about 61.2 times cheaper for the same work.

Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) reads up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash.

Only Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) offers image input.

On our blended benchmark score Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) leads 63.9 to 30.4.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Ling 3.0 Flash scores higher on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others), Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

Ling 3.0 Flash was released in July 2026 and Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) in June 2026.

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you need lower cost; pick Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) if you need long documents, image input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 FlashAnthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch)
SQL Generation 135 141
Code Review 132 144
Code Completion 129 120
Code Refactoring 133 146
Bug Fixing 136 148
Unit Test Generation 125 131
Code Documentation 129 136
Regex Writing 123 125
CI/CD Pipelines 121 127
Frontend Component Design 96 129
Data Analysis 129 133
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 129 135
ETL Scripting 127 136
JSON Extraction 132 122
Bulk Data Labeling 130 120
OCR / Document Parsing 84 134
Table Extraction from PDFs 84 134
Long-Document Summarization 135 147
Short-Form Summarization 125 118
Blog Post Writing 123 129

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs MiniMax: MiniMax M3 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.3 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.