picksbymodel Get API access →

head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-04.

	Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)	DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Vendor	google	deepseek
Quality Score	100	100
Benchmark Score	93.4	90.0
Input Price	$0.38/M	$0.22/M
Output Price	$1.88/M	$0.66/M
Context Window	1,048,576	1,048,576
Max Output	65,536	384,000
Tool Calling	✓	✓
Structured Output	✓	✓
Reasoning Mode	✓	✓
Vision	✓	✓
Audio	✓	-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index	96.8	84.9
ai_index_agentic	82.5	87.2
ai_index_coding	100.0	100.0

Who wins by task?

Task	Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)	DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
SQL Generation	173	173
Code Review	169	167
Code Refactoring	166	164
Bug Fixing	183	182
Unit Test Generation	156	155
Code Documentation	144	144
Regex Writing	138	137
CI/CD Pipelines	146	145
Frontend Component Design	148	147
Data Analysis	173	172
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup	155	154
ETL Scripting	156	155
JSON Extraction	149	149
Bulk Data Labeling	135	135
OCR / Document Parsing	147	147
Table Extraction from PDFs	147	147
Long-Document Summarization	162	160
Short-Form Summarization	132	132
Blog Post Writing	142	141

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash