picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-08-14.

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash
Vendorgooglegoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score89.784.4
Input Price$0.19/M$0.75/M
Output Price$0.94/M$3.75/M
Context Window1,048,5761,048,576
Max Output65,53665,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index92.485.1
ai_index_agentic74.466.8
ai_index_coding100.0100.0

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash
SQL Generation 172 170
Code Review 168 165
Code Completion 133 132
Code Refactoring 165 163
Bug Fixing 181 178
Unit Test Generation 155 153
Code Documentation 144 142
Regex Writing 137 135
CI/CD Pipelines 145 143
Frontend Component Design 147 145
Data Analysis 171 168
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 154 154
ETL Scripting 155 153
JSON Extraction 149 148
Bulk Data Labeling 135 134
OCR / Document Parsing 147 146
Table Extraction from PDFs 147 146
Long-Document Summarization 161 159
Short-Form Summarization 132 131
Blog Post Writing 141 139

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Sakana: Sakana Namazu Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max