head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano
Vendorgoogleopenai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score84.268.1
Input Price$1.50/M$0.20/M
Output Price$9.00/M$1.25/M
Context Window1,048,576400,000
Max Output65,536128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index82.863.1
ai_index_agentic61.845.4
ai_index_coding100.092.5

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.51 and Gemini 3.5 Flash costs $3.75, so GPT-5.4 Nano is about 7.3 times cheaper for the same work.

Gemini 3.5 Flash reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 600 pages for GPT-5.4 Nano.

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash offers audio input and video input.

On our blended benchmark score Gemini 3.5 Flash leads 84.2 to 68.1.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Gemini 3.5 Flash scores higher on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), GPT-5.4 Nano on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others).

Gemini 3.5 Flash was released in May 2026 and GPT-5.4 Nano in March 2026.

Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash if you need long documents, audio input, video input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick GPT-5.4 Nano if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.5 FlashOpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano
SQL Generation 168 163
Code Review 164 158
Code Completion 119 133
Code Refactoring 162 157
Bug Fixing 176 168
Unit Test Generation 152 148
Code Documentation 141 140
Regex Writing 133 132
CI/CD Pipelines 143 139
Frontend Component Design 145 141
Data Analysis 167 159
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 153 151
ETL Scripting 152 148
JSON Extraction 138 146
Bulk Data Labeling 124 134
OCR / Document Parsing 146 144
Table Extraction from PDFs 146 144
Long-Document Summarization 157 154
Short-Form Summarization 121 130
Blog Post Writing 138 135

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano Anthropic: Claude Sonnet Latest vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.