head-to-head

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-11.

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash Thinking Machines: Inkling
Vendorz-aithinkingmachines
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score70.639.4
Input Price$0.15/M$1.00/M
Output Price$0.50/M$4.05/M
Context Window1,048,576524,288
Max Output943,717471,859
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓-
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index69.041.2

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.28 and Inkling costs $2.01, so GLM 5.3 Flash is about 7.3 times cheaper for the same work.

GLM 5.3 Flash reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 786 pages for Inkling.

Only GLM 5.3 Flash offers structured output and video input; only Inkling offers audio input.

On our blended benchmark score GLM 5.3 Flash leads 70.6 to 39.4.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on 20 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

GLM 5.3 Flash was released in August 2026 and Inkling in July 2026.

Pick GLM 5.3 Flash if you need lower cost, long documents, structured output, video input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Inkling if you need audio input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskZ.ai: GLM 5.3 FlashThinking Machines: Inkling
SQL Generation 142 130
Code Review 145 135
Code Completion 133 119
Code Refactoring 147 138
Bug Fixing 149 143
Unit Test Generation 132 120
Code Documentation 138 134
Regex Writing 126 123
CI/CD Pipelines 128 120
Frontend Component Design 130 122
Data Analysis 134 126
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 123
ETL Scripting 137 129
JSON Extraction 131 111
Bulk Data Labeling 129 116
OCR / Document Parsing 134 125
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 125
Long-Document Summarization 149 144
Short-Form Summarization 127 117
Blog Post Writing 130 126

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Thinking Machines: Inkling ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Cohere: Command A+ vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.