head-to-head

SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-27.

SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
Vendorx-aianthropic
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score75.384.3
Input Price$2.00/M$2.50/M
Output Price$6.00/M$12.50/M
Context Window500,0001,000,000
Max Output450,000128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index73.169.0
eqbench-83.3

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Grok 4.6 costs $3.50 and Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) costs $5.62, so Grok 4.6 is about 1.6 times cheaper for the same work.

Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) reads up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text, against about 750 pages for Grok 4.6.

On our blended benchmark score Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) leads 84.3 to 75.3.

Across the 19 tasks where they differ, Grok 4.6 scores higher on 2 (JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling), Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) on 17 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

Grok 4.6 was released in August 2026 and Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) in May 2026.

Pick Grok 4.6 if you need lower cost; pick Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) if you need long documents, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskSpaceXAI: Grok 4.6Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
SQL Generation 142 146
Code Review 145 155
Code Completion 119 120
Code Refactoring 147 157
Bug Fixing 149 159
Unit Test Generation 132 138
Code Documentation 137 141
Regex Writing 125 127
CI/CD Pipelines 128 134
Frontend Component Design 130 133
Data Analysis 135 139
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 140
ETL Scripting 138 146
JSON Extraction 122 121
Bulk Data Labeling 119 117
OCR / Document Parsing 134 136
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 136
Long-Document Summarization 148 158
Blog Post Writing 130 134

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.