head-to-head

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)
Vendoranthropicgoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score93.7-
Input Price$2.50/M$0.12/M
Output Price$12.50/M$0.75/M
Context Window1,000,0001,048,576
Max Output128,00065,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index91.9-
ai_index_agentic77.8-
ai_index_coding100.0-
eqbench74.2-

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) costs $0.31 and Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) costs $5.62, so Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) is about 18.0 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,000,000 and 1,048,576 tokens, about 1,500 and 1,573 pages.

Only Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) offers audio input and video input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) scores higher on 17 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) on 3 (Code Completion, Bulk Data Labeling, Short-Form Summarization).

Pick Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) if you need the stronger all-round task scores; pick Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) if you need lower cost, audio input or video input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskAnthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)
SQL Generation 176 133
Code Review 177 132
Code Completion 121 131
Code Refactoring 174 136
Bug Fixing 190 136
Unit Test Generation 160 124
Code Documentation 147 131
Regex Writing 137 119
CI/CD Pipelines 150 120
Frontend Component Design 150 122
Data Analysis 176 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 158 133
ETL Scripting 162 128
JSON Extraction 138 131
Bulk Data Labeling 123 129
OCR / Document Parsing 149 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 149 131
Long-Document Summarization 169 137
Short-Form Summarization 123 123
Blog Post Writing 145 121

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna Pro vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch) OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol Pro (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.