head-to-head

Thinking Machines: Inkling vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

Thinking Machines: Inkling Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Vendorthinkingmachinesqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-52.9
Input Price$1.00/M$0.10/M
Output Price$4.05/M$0.90/M
Context Window524,288262,144
Max Output471,859235,929
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output-✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-52.2
ai_index_agentic-35.3
ai_index_coding-69.1

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.33 and Inkling costs $2.01, so Qwen3.6 35B A3B is about 6.2 times cheaper for the same work.

Inkling reads up to 524,288 tokens at once, roughly 786 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Qwen3.6 35B A3B.

Only Inkling offers audio input; only Qwen3.6 35B A3B offers structured output and video input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.6 35B A3B on 20 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

Inkling was released in July 2026 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B in April 2026.

Pick Inkling if you need long documents or audio input; pick Qwen3.6 35B A3B if you need lower cost, structured output, video input or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskThinking Machines: InklingQwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B
SQL Generation 125 154
Code Review 128 147
Code Completion 119 130
Code Refactoring 132 144
Bug Fixing 136 156
Unit Test Generation 116 140
Code Documentation 131 133
Regex Writing 119 129
CI/CD Pipelines 116 132
Frontend Component Design 118 137
Data Analysis 120 151
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 121 141
ETL Scripting 124 138
JSON Extraction 111 143
Bulk Data Labeling 116 133
OCR / Document Parsing 123 138
Table Extraction from PDFs 123 138
Long-Document Summarization 137 142
Short-Form Summarization 115 128
Blog Post Writing 121 130

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Thinking Machines: Inkling Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B Anthropic: Claude Sonnet Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 35B A3B ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs Thinking Machines: Inkling ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Thinking Machines: Inkling DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Thinking Machines: Inkling DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.