head-to-head

Thinking Machines: Inkling Small vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

Thinking Machines: Inkling Small Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)
Vendorthinkingmachinesanthropic
Quality Score100100
Input Price$0.45/M$2.50/M
Output Price$1.20/M$12.50/M
Context Window524,2881,000,000
Max Output262,144128,000
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output-✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Inkling Small costs $0.75 and Claude Opus 5 (batch) costs $5.62, so Inkling Small is about 7.5 times cheaper for the same work.

Claude Opus 5 (batch) reads up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text, against about 786 pages for Inkling Small.

Only Inkling Small offers audio input; only Claude Opus 5 (batch) offers structured output.

Across the 19 tasks where they differ, Inkling Small scores higher on 7 (Code Completion, Code Documentation, Regex Writing and others), Claude Opus 5 (batch) on 12 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

Pick Inkling Small if you need lower cost or audio input; pick Claude Opus 5 (batch) if you need long documents or structured output.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskThinking Machines: Inkling SmallAnthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch)
SQL Generation 125 132
Code Review 128 132
Code Completion 131 117
Code Refactoring 132 136
Unit Test Generation 116 124
Code Documentation 131 129
Regex Writing 119 117
CI/CD Pipelines 116 120
Frontend Component Design 118 122
Data Analysis 120 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 121 132
ETL Scripting 124 128
JSON Extraction 119 121
Bulk Data Labeling 125 117
OCR / Document Parsing 123 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 123 131
Long-Document Summarization 137 136
Short-Form Summarization 123 113
Blog Post Writing 121 120

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Opus 5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.