head-to-head

StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus
Vendorstepfunqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score50.868.3
Input Price$0.20/M$0.33/M
Output Price$1.15/M$1.95/M
Context Window262,1441,000,000
Max Output230,40065,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index49.965.3
ai_index_agentic35.545.5
ai_index_coding65.390.0

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Step 3.7 Flash costs $0.49 and Qwen3.6 Plus costs $0.81, so Step 3.7 Flash is about 1.7 times cheaper for the same work.

Qwen3.6 Plus reads up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Step 3.7 Flash.

On our blended benchmark score Qwen3.6 Plus leads 68.3 to 50.8.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.6 Plus on 20 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

Step 3.7 Flash was released in May 2026 and Qwen3.6 Plus in April 2026.

Pick Step 3.7 Flash if you need lower cost; pick Qwen3.6 Plus if you need long documents, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskStepFun: Step 3.7 FlashQwen: Qwen3.6 Plus
SQL Generation 153 163
Code Review 146 158
Code Completion 130 132
Code Refactoring 144 157
Bug Fixing 155 168
Unit Test Generation 139 148
Code Documentation 133 140
Regex Writing 129 132
CI/CD Pipelines 131 139
Frontend Component Design 136 141
Data Analysis 150 159
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 141 151
ETL Scripting 137 148
JSON Extraction 142 146
Bulk Data Labeling 133 134
OCR / Document Parsing 138 144
Table Extraction from PDFs 138 144
Long-Document Summarization 142 154
Short-Form Summarization 128 130
Blog Post Writing 129 135

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.