head-to-head

StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B
Vendorstepfunqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score50.831.3
Input Price$0.20/M$0.17/M
Output Price$1.15/M$0.25/M
Context Window262,144262,144
Max Output230,400235,929
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index49.935.4
ai_index_agentic35.512.2
ai_index_coding65.347.3

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Qwen3.5-9B costs $0.23 and Step 3.7 Flash costs $0.49, so Qwen3.5-9B is about 2.1 times cheaper for the same work.

Both read up to 262,144 tokens at once, roughly 393 pages of text.

On our blended benchmark score Step 3.7 Flash leads 50.8 to 31.3.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on 20 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

Step 3.7 Flash was released in May 2026 and Qwen3.5-9B in March 2026.

Pick Step 3.7 Flash if you need benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Qwen3.5-9B if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskStepFun: Step 3.7 FlashQwen: Qwen3.5-9B
SQL Generation 153 145
Code Review 146 139
Code Completion 130 129
Code Refactoring 144 138
Bug Fixing 155 145
Unit Test Generation 139 133
Code Documentation 133 130
Regex Writing 129 126
CI/CD Pipelines 131 126
Frontend Component Design 136 131
Data Analysis 150 140
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 141 137
ETL Scripting 137 132
JSON Extraction 142 139
Bulk Data Labeling 133 132
OCR / Document Parsing 138 135
Table Extraction from PDFs 138 135
Long-Document Summarization 142 138
Short-Form Summarization 128 127
Blog Post Writing 129 126

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Code vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B ByteDance Seed: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.