picksbymodel Get API access →
head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-06-27.

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B
Vendorgoogleqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-40.0
Input Price$0.25/M$0.10/M
Output Price$1.50/M$0.15/M
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output65,536262,144
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-41.2
ai_index_coding-47.3

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteQwen: Qwen3.5-9B
SQL Generation 133 144
Code Review 132 139
Code Completion 131 130
Code Refactoring 136 138
Bug Fixing 136 144
Unit Test Generation 124 132
Code Documentation 131 131
Regex Writing 119 126
CI/CD Pipelines 120 126
Frontend Component Design 122 131
Data Analysis 124 138
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 133 137
ETL Scripting 128 132
JSON Extraction 131 139
Bulk Data Labeling 129 132
OCR / Document Parsing 131 135
Table Extraction from PDFs 131 135
Long-Document Summarization 137 138
Short-Form Summarization 123 127
Blog Post Writing 121 126

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B