head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-11-07.

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Vendorqweninclusionai
Quality Score100100
Input Price$0.15/M$0.06/M
Output Price$0.47/M$0.18/M
Context Window1,000,000131,072
Max Output131,07232,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.10 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs $0.27, so Ling 3.0 Flash VL is about 2.5 times cheaper for the same work.

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash reads up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text, against about 197 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.

Only Qwen3.8 Omni Flash offers audio input.

Across the 18 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash scores higher on 14 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others), Ling 3.0 Flash VL on 4 (Regex Writing, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others).

Pick Qwen3.8 Omni Flash if you need long documents, audio input or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.8 Omni FlashinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL
SQL Generation 133 128
Code Review 132 121
Code Completion 131 126
Code Refactoring 136 119
Bug Fixing 136 125
Unit Test Generation 124 118
Code Documentation 131 121
Regex Writing 119 120
CI/CD Pipelines 120 114
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 133 123
ETL Scripting 128 117
JSON Extraction 131 132
Bulk Data Labeling 129 129
OCR / Document Parsing 131 125
Table Extraction from PDFs 131 125
Long-Document Summarization 137 121
Short-Form Summarization 123 124
Blog Post Writing 121 116

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.